Faculty Bibliography

»:Mental health and psychosocial factors play a critical role in clinical outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. »:The biopsychosocial model of disease defines health as a product of physiology, psychology, and social factors and, traditionally, has not been as emphasized in the care of musculoskeletal disease. »:Improvement in postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction is incumbent upon the screening, recognition, assessment, and possible referral of patients with high-risk psychosocial factors both before and after the surgical procedure.

BACKGROUND:Under current Medicare bundled payment programs, when a patient undergoes a subsequent elective procedure within the 90-day episode-of-care, the first procedure is excluded from the bundle and a new episode-of-care initiated. The purpose of this study was to determine if staging bilateral total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures within 90 days have an effect on bundled episode-of-care costs. METHODS:We reviewed a consecutive series of Medicare patients undergoing staged primary THA and TKA from 2015-2019. Patients who underwent a prior procedure within 90 days were compared to those who had undergone a procedure 90-120 days prior. We then performed a multivariate analysis to identify the independent effect of staging timeframe on costs and outcomes. RESULTS:Of the 136 patients undergoing a staged bilateral THA or TKA, 48 patients underwent staged procedures within 90 days (35%) and 88 patients between 91-120 days (65%). There were no significant differences observed for demographics, comorbidities, complications, readmissions, or discharge disposition (all P > .05). Patients undergoing a staged procedure within 90 days had increased episode-of-care costs by $2021 (95% CI $11-$4032, P = .049), increased postacute care costs by $2019 (95% CI $66-$3971, P < .001), and reduced per-patient margin by $2868 (95% CI-$866-$4869, P = .005). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing staged bilateral THA or TKA within 90 days have increased episode-of-care costs compared to those undergoing a staged procedure from 91-120 days. Since patients may still not be fully recovered from the first procedure, CMS should address the inappropriate allocation of costs to ensure institutions are not penalized.

BACKGROUND:Patients with adverse spinopelvic mobility have higher complication rates following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Risk factors include a stiff lumbar spine, standing posterior pelvic tilt ≤ -10°, and a severe sagittal spinal deformity (pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch ≥20°). The purpose of this study is to define the spinopelvic risk factors and quantify the prevalence of risk factors for pathologic spinopelvic mobility. METHODS:A retrospective cohort analysis from January 2014 to February 2020 was performed on a multicenter series of 9414 primary THAs by 168 surgeons, all with preoperative spinopelvic measurements in the supine, standing, and flex-seated positions. All patients were included. The prevalence of adverse spinopelvic mobility and frequency of each spinopelvic risk factor was calculated. RESULTS:The cohort was 52% female, 48% male, with an average age of 65 years. Thirteen percent of patients exhibited adverse spinopelvic mobility and 17% had one or more of the 3 risk factors. Adverse mobility was found in 35% of patients with at least 1 risk factor, 47% with at least 2 risk factors, and 57% with all 3 risk factors. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Forty-six percent of patients had spinopelvic pathology driven by one or more of the risk factors. Number of risk factors present and risk of adverse spinopelvic mobility were positively correlated, with 57% of patients with all 3 risk factors exhibiting adverse spinopelvic mobility. Although this study defines the prevalence of these risk factors in this highly selected cohort, it does not report incidence in a general THA population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level IV.

BACKGROUND:Patients with spinopelvic pathology, including lumbar spine stiffness and sagittal spinal deformity, are at increased risk for postoperative complications, including instability, dislocation, and revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Recent evidence has suggested that the Lewinnek safe zone should no longer be considered an appropriate target for all patients, especially those with spinopelvic pathology, as the safe zone is a dynamic rather than static target. There are 2 distinct issues for arthroplasty surgeons to consider: lumbar spinal stiffness and sagittal spinal deformity, each of which has its own management. METHODS:In order to manage patients with spinopelvic pathology undergoing THA, a basic understanding of spinopelvic parameters, including sagittal balance, sacral slope, and anterior pelvic plane, is essential. Techniques outlined in this manuscript describe a systematic preoperative work-up and intraoperative management of acetabular component positioning according to patient-specific spinopelvic parameters, ensuring optimal component placement and a reduced risk for impingement, instability, and poor postoperative outcomes. RESULTS:Evaluation of each patient's spinopelvic parameters informs patient classification according to the Hip-Spine Classification for THA. Patient classification is determined by the presence of spinal stiffness and spinal deformity, with corresponding scoring and classification into one of the 4 categories used to determine risk for postoperative dislocation, define patient-specific cup positioning, and create their functional safe zone. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:A simple 2-step preoperative assessment with measurements of the anterior pelvic plane and the sacral slope on standing and seated lateral X-rays will identify patients at high risk for postoperative dislocation due to spinal deformity and/or stiffness. Accounting for spinopelvic pathology and adhering to the Hip-Spine Classification guidelines for acetabular component positioning can help reduce the burden of instability and revisions in this complex patient population.

Understanding spinopelvic motion and the dynamic relationship of the hip, spine, and pelvis is essential in decreasing the risk of instability after total hip arthroplasty. The hip-spine relationship is complex, and a detailed analysis of each patient's spinopelvic mobility is warranted to help guide safe acetabular component positioning. Through the use of a standing anteroposterior pelvis X-ray, lateral spinopelvic radiographs in the standing and seated position, and advanced functional imaging, key spinopelvic parameters can be obtained. A systematic preoperative workup can help to identify hip-spine pathology that predisposes patients to instability, and can help in planning and establishing a patient-specific "safe zone." Based on the presence of concomitant hip-spine pathology, patients must be evaluated thoroughly with preoperative imaging to plan for the optimal target acetabular cup position. This paper guides readers through important parameters and imaging associated to spinopelvic motion as it relates to total hip arthroplasty stability.

AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Patients with spinal pathology who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) have an increased risk of dislocation and revision. The aim of this study was to determine if the use of the Hip-Spine Classification system in these patients would result in a decreased rate of postoperative dislocation in patients with spinal pathology. METHODS:This prospective, multicentre study evaluated 3,777 consecutive patients undergoing THA by three surgeons, between January 2014 and December 2019. They were categorized using The Hip-Spine Classification system: group 1 with normal spinal alignment; group 2 with a flatback deformity, group 2A with normal spinal mobility, and group 2B with a stiff spine. Flatback deformity was defined by a pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis of > 10°, and spinal stiffness was defined by < 10° change in sacral slope from standing to seated. Each category determined a patient-specific component positioning. Survivorship free of dislocation was recorded and spinopelvic measurements were compared for reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS:A total of 2,081 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 987 group 1A, 232 group 1B, 715 group 2A, and 147 group 2B patients. A total of 70 patients had a lumbar fusion, most had L4-5 (16; 23%) or L4-S1 (12; 17%) fusions; 51 patients (73%) had one or two levels fused, and 19 (27%) had > three levels fused. Dual mobility (DM) components were used in 166 patients (8%), including all of those in group 2B and with > three level fusions. Survivorship free of dislocation at five years was 99.2% with a 0.8% dislocation rate. The correlation coefficient was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.89 to 0.91). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS: 2021;103-B(7 Supple B):17-24.

STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:The interactions between hip osteoarthritis (OA) and spinal malalignment are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of total hip arthroplasty (THA) on standing spinopelvic alignment. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:In this retrospective cohort study, patients undergoing THA for OA with pre-and postoperative full-body radiographs were included. Standing spinopelvic parameters were measured. Contralateral hip was graded on the Kellgren-Lawrence scale. Pre-and postoperative alignment parameters were compared by paired t-test. The severity of preoperative thoracolumbar deformity was measured using TPA. Linear regression was performed to assess the impact of preoperative TPA and changes in spinal alignment. Patients were separated into low and high TPA (<20 or >/=20 deg) and change in parameters were compared between groups by t-test. Similarly, the influence of K-L grade, age, and PI were also tested. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:= .004). Preoperative TPA was significantly associated with the change in PI-LL, SVA, and TPA. High TPA patients significantly decreased SVA more than low TPA patients. There was no significant impact of contralateral hip OA, PI, or age on change in alignment parameters. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Spinopelvic alignment changes after THA, evident by a reduction in SVA. Preoperative spinal sagittal deformity impacts this change. Level of evidence: III.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Sutures and staples are the mainstay wound closure techniques in total joint arthroplasty. Newer techniques such as zipper devices and novel skin adhesives have emerged because of their potential to decrease operative time and possibly minimize complications. The aim of this study is to compare these newer techniques against conventional sutures with respect to wound complications, closure time, and costs. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A single-center randomized control trial was conducted on 160 patients (52 zipper, 55 suture, 53 mesh) who underwent primary total hip or knee arthroplasty between February 2017 and May 2018. Patients were divided into 3 closure groups: zipper device, monofilament suture plus adhesive, and monofilament plus polyester mesh with adhesive. The primary endpoint was closure time (superficial skin layer). Secondarily we collected perioperative complication rates, including infection, persistent (14-day) wound drainage, 90-day readmission, and emergency room visit rates as well as compared material costs. Results/UNASSIGNED:There were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups for age, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. There was a trend toward decreased time to closure for the suture group. There were no significant differences between groups for our secondary endpoint, complications. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Our study shows that the suture group trended toward shorter closure time but suggests that each of the closure methods after total joint arthroplasty has equivalent complication rates. With small differences in closure time and no significant differences in complications, the decision to use one wound closure device or technique over another should be driven by institutional costs and provider familiarity.