Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:To review the technical success of image-guided percutaneous cryoablation of renal masses in difficult anatomic locations using adjunctive techniques to displace critical structures away from the ablation zone, while also reporting longer-term outcomes within this patient population. METHODS:An IRB approved, retrospective analysis of 92 renal masses treated with percutaneous cryoablation revealed 15 cases utilizing adjunctive techniques. Tumor size and distance to adjacent organ before and after adjunctive technique and long-term outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS:The adjunctive techniques used were hydrodissection (n=15) and angioplasty balloon interposition (n=1). Before and after adjunctive technique, median tumor proximity to closest organ was 4mm and 26mm, respectively. All cases had appropriate ablation zones and protection of adjacent critical structures. There is no evidence of recurrence or complication on follow-up (median 51months). CONCLUSIONS:Adjunctive techniques to ablate renal masses in difficult locations provide technical success, safety, and favorable long-term outcomes.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To survey residents who participated in the 2015 interventional radiology fellowship match regarding the overall process, including the number of interviews received, programs ranked, money spent, and perceived effect on board preparation. METHODS:An IRB-approved, anonymous web-based survey was distributed via email link to 151 individuals in 41 states who had interview at 1 of 2 IR fellowship programs in the United States. Most of the survey's 12 questions were based on a five-point Likert scale, while others were free-text response. RESULTS:Seventy-five out of 151 residents completed the survey (response rate 49.7%). When asked if the current timing of the core board examination worked well with the IR interview schedule, 62 (96.6%) either strong disagreed or disagreed. Sixty respondents (87%) reported that preparing for and traveling to IR interviews had a very negative or somewhat negative effect on boards preparation. When asked what change they would make to the timing of IR interviews or the core examination, 55 (79.7%) thought that IR fellowship interviews should occur earlier in the year. The median number of IR programs applied to, interviews offered, interviews completed, and programs ranked were 28, 13, 10, and 10, respectively. When asked how much money was spent on the application and interview process, 39% spent between $5000 and $9999, and 17% spent more than $10000. CONCLUSIONS:A substantial percentage of radiology residents who participated in the 2015 IR fellowship match have concerns about the proximity of board preparation to the match process. Consideration for restructuring the timing of this process is recommended.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Develop a technique to quantify intensity of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) on Tc-labeled red blood cell (RBC) scintigraphy, correlate with angiography, and determine the tool's predictive value. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:An IRB-approved, single institution database query of GI bleeding scans performed between January 2013 and December 2015. Reports from all studies and imaging from all positive studies were reviewed. A technique was developed for scan analysis, allowing for calculation of percent increase of activity in the region of interest (ROI, area of bleeding) and ROI in the aorta and liver (controls). Database query determined which patients underwent angiography, and which had positive angiograms. Median ROI percent increase in patients with positive scintigraphy and positive angiography was compared to those with positive scintigraphy and negative angiography. RESULTS:Of 194 bleeding scans performed during the study period, 71 were positive for active LGIB, 37 had angiography, and 9 had active contrast extravasation. The new tool was used to analyze the 37 cases with positive nuclear scans sent for angiography. Median percent increase in ROI activity was 50% in those with positive scan and positive angiogram and 26.8% in those with positive scan but negative angiogram. Using ROI percent change quartiles, we observed a statistically significant association between percent increase in ROI activity from baseline and the probability of having a positive angiogram (Cochran-Armitage trend test, P = 0.01), such that there are no positive angiogram cases when ROI change was <20% and a majority of the positive angiogram cases (67%) in the highest quartile. CONCLUSIONS:Utilization of processing protocol to determine percent increase in activity from baseline within ROI of active LGIB on scintigraphy has predictive value in determining which patients will not benefit from conventional angiography.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To characterize and compare the experiences of matched applicants and program directors (PDs) participating in the first large-scale integrated interventional radiology (IR) residency match. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Survey questionnaires were distributed nationally to integrated IR applicants who matched in the 2017 Match cycle and PDs. Both groups were questioned regarding their experiences with the application, interview, rank, and match processes as well as applicant-specific and PD-specific information. Summary and descriptive statistics were applied to responses, and comparison of Likert scale responses was performed by two-sample t test. RESULTS:Sixty-one matched applicants (51.3%) and 34 PDs (55.7%) responded to the survey. Regarding the match process, applicants believed United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score (P = .002) and connection to a program's geographic location (P = .006) were significantly more important than PDs did, whereas PDs ranked grades (P = .049), class rank (P = .011), academic awards (P = .003), additional degrees (P < .001), and USMLE Step 2 Clinical Skills score (P < .001) as significantly more important factors than applicants did. Additional information regarding demographic data, medical school experiences in IR, application strategies, interview experiences, rank lists, the intern year, and match results are reported. CONCLUSIONS:The completion of the first large-scale integrated IR match represents a paradigm shift in the way in which IR practitioners are recruited and trained. This study provides valuable benchmark data and analysis that can be used to improve efforts to match the best-fitting applicants into the integrated IR residency and improve future match cycles for applicants and PDs alike.

Mentoring is an extremely important component of academic medicine, including radiology, yet it is not specifically emphasized in radiology training, and many academic radiology departments in the United States, Canada, and elsewhere do not have formal mentoring programs for medical students, residents, fellows, or junior faculty. The purpose of this article is to overview the current status of mentorship in radiology, to discuss the importance of mentorship at multiple levels and its potential benefits in particular, as well as how to conduct a successful mentor-mentee relationship. The literature on mentorship in radiology and in academic medicine in general is reviewed.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Radiology fellowship training has evolved from being an uncommon option to being a near requisite for post-training employment in the United States. A subset of fellows elect to pursue second fellowships with potentially substantial implications on both the private sector and academic radiology workforce. The purpose of this study was to assess the proportion of current radiology fellows pursuing multiple years of post-residency fellowship training. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:After obtaining IRB approval, an anonymous web-based survey was emailed to 1,269 radiology fellows listed as "completing fellowship" in the American College of Radiology database in June 2014. Questions were asked regarding current fellowship training, post-fellowship employment plans, and individual experience pursuing employment. Results were analyzed using the survey analytical software. RESULTS:There were 219 responses received, representing a 17.3% response rate. Ten-percent of respondents were currently completing their second radiology fellowship. Of those completing their first year of fellowship training, 11% indicated plans to complete a second radiology fellowship. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This survey provides a snapshot of the percentage of radiology trainees who pursue a second year of fellowship training, currently in the range of 10%. Pursuing a second radiology fellowship may represent a safety net to a substantial subset of fellows who are not able to obtain satisfactory employment following training. Academic programs who rely heavily on fellows should be aware of the proportion of fellows pursuing two fellowships and should be prepared to adapt should this change over time.

OBJECTIVE:The full spectrum of organized radiology consists of numerous organizations with varied missions targeting their respective members. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This article highlights many of these organizations, discusses the benefits they can provide to radiology trainees and junior faculty, and provides a road map for progressive participation among trainees to junior faculty as they advance through training.

Radiology residency training has undergone substantial changes, including increased utilization of night float systems, late and/or overnight attending radiology in-house coverage (LOAR), and restructuring of the radiology boards. The purpose of this study is to evaluate radiology residents' perceptions regarding these changes and their impact on resident training using an anonymous, web-based survey that was distributed to radiology residents across the United States. A total of 345 current radiology residents completed the survey. A substantial number of radiology residents perceive that LOARs have negative impact on their development of independence and efficiency during the on call period. Residents are concerned about the timing of the core exam and match fellowship interviews, the timing of the certifying exam, and that graduating as board-eligible radiologists will harm their job search.