Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Meningiomas in children are uncommon, with distinct characteristics that set them apart from their adult counterparts. The existing evidence for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in this patient population is limited to only case series. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SRS in managing pediatric meningiomas. METHODS:Children and adolescents who had been treated for meningioma with single-fraction SRS were included in this retrospective, multicenter study. The assessment included local tumor control, any complications related to the tumor or SRS, and the emergence of new neurological deficits after SRS. RESULTS:The cohort included 57 patients (male-to-female ratio 1.6:1) with a mean age of 14.4 years who were managed with single-fraction SRS for 78 meningiomas. The median radiological and clinical follow-up periods were 69 months (range, 6-268) and 71 months (range, 6-268), respectively. At the last follow-up, tumor control (tumor stability and regression) was achieved in 69 (85.9%) tumors. Post-SRS, new neurological deficits occurred in 2 (3.5%) patients. Adverse radiation effects occurred in 5 (8.8%) patients. A de novo aneurysm was observed in a patient 69 months after SRS. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:SRS seems to be a safe and effective up-front or adjuvant treatment option for surgically inaccessible, recurrent, or residual pediatric meningiomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Advances in targeted therapies and wider application of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) have redefined outcomes of patients with brain metastases. Under modern treatment paradigms, there remains limited characterization of which aspects of disease drive demise and in what frequencies. This study aims to characterize the primary causes of terminal decline and evaluate differences in underlying intracranial tumor dynamics in patients with metastatic brain cancer. These fundamental details may help guide management, patient counseling, and research priorities. METHODS:Using NYUMets-Brain-the largest, longitudinal, real-world, open data set of patients with brain metastases-patients treated at New York University Langone Health between 2012 and 2021 with SRS were evaluated. A review of electronic health records allowed for the determination of a primary cause of death in patients who died during the study period. Causes were classified in mutually exclusive, but collectively exhaustive, categories. Multilevel models evaluated for differences in dynamics of intracranial tumors, including changes in volume and number. RESULTS:Of 439 patients with end-of-life data, 73.1% died secondary to systemic disease, 10.3% died secondary to central nervous system (CNS) disease, and 16.6% died because of other causes. CNS deaths were driven by acute increases in intracranial pressure (11%), development of focal neurological deficits (18%), treatment-resistant seizures (11%), and global decline driven by increased intracranial tumor burden (60%). Rate of influx of new intracranial tumors was almost twice as high in patients who died compared with those who survived (P < .001), but there was no difference in rates of volume change per intracranial tumor (P = .95). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Most patients with brain metastases die secondary to systemic disease progression. For patients who die because of neurological disease, tumor dynamics and cause of death mechanisms indicate that the primary driver of decline for many may be unchecked systemic disease with unrelenting spread of new tumors to the CNS rather than failure of local growth control.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Dose selection for brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) classically has been based on tumor diameter with a reduction of dose in the settings of prior brain irradiation, larger tumor volumes, and critical brain location. However, retrospective series have shown local control rates to be suboptimal with reduced doses. We hypothesized that lower doses could be effective for specific tumor biologies with concomitant systemic therapies. This study aims to report the local control (LC) and toxicity when using low-dose SRS in the era of modern systemic therapy. METHODS:We reviewed 102 patients with 688 tumors managed between 2014 and 2021 who had low-margin dose radiosurgery, defined as ≤14 Gy. Tumor control was correlated with demographic, clinical, and dosimetric data. RESULTS:The main primary cancer types were lung in 48 (47.1%), breast in 31 (30.4%), melanoma in 8 (7.8%), and others in 15 patients (11.7%). The median tumor volume was 0.037cc (0.002-26.31 cm3), and the median margin dose was 14 Gy (range 10-14). The local failure (LF) cumulative incidence at 1 and 2 years was 6% and 12%, respectively. On competing risk regression analysis, larger volume, melanoma histology, and margin dose were predictors of LF. The 1-year and 2-year cumulative incidence of adverse radiation effects (ARE: an adverse imaging-defined response includes increased enhancement and peritumoral edema) was 0.8% and 2%. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:It is feasible to achieve acceptable LC in BMs with low-dose SRS. Volume, melanoma histology, and margin dose seem to be predictors for LF. The value of a low-dose approach may be in the management of patients with higher numbers of small or adjacent tumors with a history of whole brain radio therapy or multiple SRS sessions and in tumors in critical locations with the aim of LC and preservation of neurological function.

OBJECTIVE:Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been proposed as an alternative to resection for epilepsy control in patients with cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM) located in critical areas. METHODS:This multicentric, retrospective study evaluated seizure control in patients with a solitary CCM and a history of at least one seizure prior to SRS. RESULTS:109 patients (median age at diagnosis 28.9 years, interquartile range (IQR) 16.4 years] were included. Prior to SRS, 2 (1.8%) were seizure-free without medication, 35 (32.1%) were seizure-free with antiseizure medications (ASM), 17 (15.6%) experienced an improvement of at least 50% in seizure frequency/intensity with ASM, and 55 (50.5%) experienced an improvement of less than 50% in seizure frequency/intensity with ASM. At a median follow-up of 3.5 years post-SRS (IQR: 4.9), 52 (47.7%) patients were Engel class I, 13 (11.9%) class II, 17 (15.6%) class III, 22 (20.2%) class IVA or IVB and 5 (4.6%) class IVC. For the 72 patients who had seizures despite medication prior to SRS, a delay > 1.5 years between epilepsy presentation and SRS decreased the probability to become seizure-free, HR 0.25 (95% CI 0.09-0.66), p = 0.006. The probability of achieving Engel I at the last follow-up was 23.6 (95% CI 12.7-33.1) and 31.3% (95% CI 19.3-50.8) at 2 and 5 years respectively. 27 patients were considered as having drug-resistant epilepsy. At a median follow-up of 3.1 years (IQR: 4.7), 6 (22.2%) of them were Engel I, 3 (11.1%) Engel II, 7 (25.9%) Engel III, 8 (29.6%) Engel IVA or IVB and 3 (11.1%) Engel IVC. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:47.7% of patients managed with SRS for solitary CCM presenting with seizures achieved Engel class I at the last follow-up.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Approximately 80% of brain metastases originate from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are frequently utilized in this setting. However, concerns remain regarding the risk of radiation necrosis (RN) when SRS and ICI are administered concurrently. METHODS:A retrospective study was conducted through the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. Logistic regression models and competing risks analyses were utilized to identify predictors of any grade RN and symptomatic RN (SRN). RESULTS:was a significant predictor of developing any grade RN (OR: 2.18) and SRN (OR: 3.95). At 1-year, the cumulative incidence of any grade and SRN for all patients was 4.8% and 3.8%, respectively. For concurrent and non-concurrent groups, the cumulative incidence of any grade RN was 3.8% versus 5.3%, respectively (p = 0.35); and for SRN was 3.8% vs. 3.6%, respectively (p = 0.95). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:. Concurrent ICI and SRS do not appear to increase this risk. Radiosurgical planning techniques should aim to minimize V12 Gy.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Historical reservations regarding radiosurgery (SRS) for small-cell-lung-cancer (SCLC) brain metastases (BrM) include concerns for short-interval/diffuse CNS-progression, poor prognoses, and increased neurological mortality specific to SCLC histology. We compared SRS outcomes for SCLC and non-small-cell-lung-cancer (NSCLC) where SRS is well established. METHODS:Multicenter first-line SRS outcomes for SCLC and NSCLC from 2000-2022 were retrospectively collected (N=892-SCLC/N=4,785-NSCLC). Data from the prospective JLGK0901 SRS trial were analyzed as a comparison cohort (N=98-SCLC/N=794-NSCLC). OS and CNS-progression were analyzed using Cox-Proportional-Hazard and Fine-Gray models, respectively, with multivariable (MV) adjustment (including age/sex/performance-status/year/extracranial disease/BrM-number/BrM-volume). Mutation-stratified analyses were performed in propensity score-matched (PSM) retrospective cohorts of EGFR/ALK-positive-NSCLC, mutation-negative-NSCLC, and SCLC. RESULTS:OS was superior with NSCLC over SCLC in the retrospective dataset (median-OS, 10.5 vs 8.6 months, MV-p<0.001) and JLGK0901. Hazard estimates for first CNS-progression favoring NSCLC were similar in both datasets but reached significance in the retrospective dataset only (MV-HR:0.82 [95%-CI:0.73-0.92], p=0.001). In the PSM cohorts, there were continued OS advantages for NSCLC (median-OS, 23.7 [EGFR/ALK-positive-NSCLC] vs 13.6 [mutation-negative-NSCLC] vs 10.4 months [SCLC], pairwise-p-values<0.001), but no significant differences in CNS-progression. Neurological mortality and number of lesions at CNS-progression were similar for NSCLC and SCLC patients. Leptomeningeal-progression was increased in NSCLC patients in the retrospective dataset only (MV-HR:1.61 [95%-CI:1.14-2.26], p=0.007). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:After SRS, SCLC was associated with shorter OS compared to NSCLC. CNS progression occurred earlier in SCLC overall but was similar in patients matched on baseline characteristics. Neurological mortality, lesions at CNS-progression, and leptomeningeal-progression were comparable. These findings may better inform clinical decision-making for SCLC patients.

OBJECTIVE:In certain cases, clinicians may consider continued observation of a vestibular schwannoma after initial growth is detected. The aim of the current work was to determine if patients with growing sporadic vestibular schwannomas could be stratified by the likelihood of subsequent growth based on initial growth behavior. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Slice-by-slice volumetric tumor measurements from 3,505 serial magnetic resonance imaging studies were analyzed from 952 consecutively treated patients. SETTING/METHODS:Three tertiary-referral centers. PATIENTS/METHODS:Adults with sporadic vestibular schwannoma. INTERVENTIONS/METHODS:Wait-and-scan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Composite end point of subsequent growth- or treatment-free survival rates, where growth is defined as an additional increase of at least 20% in tumor volume from the volume at the time of initial growth. RESULTS:Among 405 patients who elected continued observation despite documented growth, stratification, of volumetric growth rate into less than 25% (reference: n = 107), 25 to less than 50% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; p = 0.06; n = 96), 50 to less than 100% (HR, 1.71; p = 0.002; n = 112), and at least 100% (HR, 2.01; p < 0.001; n = 90) change per year predicted the likelihood of future growth or treatment. Subsequent growth- or treatment-free survival rates (95% confidence interval) at year 5 after detection of initial growth were 31% (21-44%) for those with less than 25% growth per year, 18% (10-32%) for those with 25 to less than 50%, 15% (9-26%) for those with 50 to less than 100%, and 6% (2-16%) for those with at least 100%. Neither patient age ( p = 0.15) nor tumor volume at diagnosis ( p = 0.95) significantly differed across stratification groups. CONCLUSIONS:At the time of diagnosis, clinical features cannot consistently predict which tumors will ultimately display aggressive behavior. Stratification by volumetric growth rate at the time of initial growth results in a stepwise progression of increasing likelihood of subsequent growth. When considering continued observation after initial growth detection, almost 95% of patients who have tumors that double in volume between diagnosis and the first detection of growth demonstrate further tumor growth or undergo treatment if observed to 5 years.

BACKGROUND:Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for persistent cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) has generally favorable patient outcomes. However, reporting studies are limited by small patient numbers and single-institution biases. The purpose of this study was to provide the combined experience of multiple centers, in an effort to fully define the role of repeat SRS for patients with arteriovenous malformation. METHODS:This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients treated with repeat, single-fraction SRS between 1987 and 2022. Follow-up began at repeat SRS. The primary outcome was a favorable patient outcome, defined as a composite of nidus obliteration in the absence of hemorrhage or radiation-induced neurological deterioration. Secondary outcomes were obliteration, hemorrhage risk, and symptomatic radiation-induced changes. Competing risk analysis was performed to compute yearly rates and identify predictors for each outcome. RESULTS:<0.001) were associated with reduced probability of favorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS:Repeat SRS confers reasonable obliteration rates with a low complication risk. With most complications occurring in the first 3 years, extending the latency period to 5 years generally increases the rate of favorable patient outcomes and reduces the necessity of a third intervention.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are highly effective treatments for brain metastases, particularly when these therapies are administered concurrently. However, there are limited data reporting the risk of radiation necrosis (RN) in this setting. METHODS:Patients with brain metastases from primary non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, or melanoma treated with SRS and ICI were considered. Time-to-event analyses were conducted for any grade RN and symptomatic RN (SRN) with death incorporated as a competing risk. Additionally, as a secondary analysis, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was utilized for model development, and a loop of potential models was analyzed, with the highest-fidelity model selected. Brain V12 Gy thresholds identified on RPA were then incorporated into the competing risks analysis. RESULTS:) (p = < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in rates of any grade RN or SRN when accounting for concurrent versus non-concurrent therapy for all patients and by V12 risk groups identified on RPA. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Utilization of SRS and ICI results in a low risk of RN and SRN and is not increased with concurrent administration. Therefore, ICI can safely be administered within 4-weeks of SRS. Three risk groups based on V12 Gy were identified, which clinicians may consider to further reduce rates of RN.