Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:



Total Results:


Cerebellar Flocculus Pseudomass Protruding into the Internal Auditory Canal

Kowalski, Haley R; Cottrell, Justin; Hagiwara, Mari; McMenomey, Sean O
PMID: 38152018
ISSN: 1537-4505
CID: 5623232

Cochlear Implantation in Children Under 9 Months of Age: Safety and Efficacy

Cottrell, Justin; Spitzer, Emily; Friedmann, David; Jethanamest, Daniel; McMenomey, Sean; Roland, J Thomas; Waltzman, Susan
OBJECTIVE:To assess the safety of cochlear implants (CIs) in children under 9 months of age to better understand expected postoperative complication rates, and to provide a preliminary look at efficacy. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Single-center retrospective review. SETTING/METHODS:Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS/METHODS:Children 5 to 8 months of age who received a CI between 2011 and 2021. INTERVENTIONS/METHODS:Therapeutic-CI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:The primary outcome was 6-month postoperative complication rate. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, device explantation/reimplantation, rehabilitation supports, and hearing and language outcomes. Complications of children implanted under than 9 months of age was compared with a cohort of children implanted 9 to 18 months of age between the years 2011 and 2016 using a chi-squared test (p < 0.05). RESULTS:One hundred six children under 9 months of age were implanted (204 CIs) at a mean age of 6.6 months (range: 5-8). Postoperative complications occurred in 28 patients (26%) and were often minor. There were no mortalities. There was no statistically significant difference in complications, including reimplantation rates, between patients implanted under 9 months of age and those implanted 9 to 18 months of age. Speech discrimination outcomes were excellent, and mean spoken language outcomes were near normative for typically developing children. CONCLUSIONS:Cochlear implantation can be a safe and effective treatment option for children 5 to 8 months of age. Early hearing screening and referral for infants to receive appropriate intervention will continue to play a critical role in optimizing speech and language outcomes.
PMID: 38082466
ISSN: 1537-4505
CID: 5589152

Bilateral cochlear implantation after immunotherapy-related profound hearing loss: A case report [Case Report]

Schlacter, Jamie A; Kay-Rivest, Emily; McMenomey, Sean O; Roland, J Thomas; Friedmann, David R; Jethanamest, Daniel
OBJECTIVES:Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are being utilized with increasing frequency and may be linked to neurologic and audiovestibular toxicities. This report aimed to describe a case of ICI-induced sensorineural hearing loss ultimately requiring bilateral cochlear implantation. METHODS:A 42-year-old female with stage IV metastatic melanoma of the perianal skin was treated with ipilimumab (blocker of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 [CTLA-4]) and nivolumab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 [PD1]). After 21 weeks of therapy, she developed sudden vertigo and bilateral hearing loss. A full workup including MRI and lumbar puncture ruled out intracranial parenchymal metastases, leptomeningeal metastases, stroke and intracranial infection. ICI-associated aseptic meningoencephalitis was therefore diagnosed. The patient received systemic steroids as well as intratympanic steroids, which temporarily improved hearing, but eventually developed permanent, bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss. RESULTS:The patient received bilateral cochlear implants and has demonstrated good performance one year after implantation. DISCUSSION:ICI are being increasingly used to treat a variety of advanced malignancies. This is the first report of bilateral cochlear implants in the context of profound hearing loss after an immunotherapy induced meningoencephalitis. CONCLUSION:ICI carries the risk of potential ototoxicity, including profound SNHL as depicted in our case. Cochlear implantation proved to be beneficial and may be considered in patients with ICI-related hearing loss.
PMID: 36988037
ISSN: 1754-7628
CID: 5591702

Slim Modiolar Electrode Placement in Candidates for Electroacoustic Stimulation

Kay-Rivest, Emily; Winchester, Arianna; McMenomey, Sean O; Jethanamest, Daniel; Roland, J Thomas; Friedmann, David R
OBJECTIVES:To determine rates of hearing preservation and performance in patients who met candidacy for electroacoustic stimulation (EAS) and were implanted with a slim modiolar electrode (CI532 or CI632). DESIGN:Adult patients meeting Food and Drug Administration criteria for electroacoustic stimulation (preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average [LFPTA] less than 60 dB at 125, 250, and 500 Hz and monosyllabic word scores between 10% and 60% in the ear to be implanted), who received a slim modiolar electrode were included. Main outcome measures included rates of hearing preservation, defined as a LFPTA ≤80 dB at 125, 250, and 500 Hz, as well as postoperative low-frequency pure-tone threshold shifts, consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word scores and AzBio sentences in noise scores. RESULTS:Forty-six patients met inclusion criteria during a 4-year period. Mean (standard deviation) preoperative LFPTA was 34.5 (13.0) dB, and 71.7% had preserved hearing at initial activation. The mean LFPTA shift in patients who preserved hearing at initial activation was 19.7 (14.6) dB, compared with 62.6 (17.7) dB in patients who did not preserve hearing as per our definition. Perioperative steroid use was not different in patients with and without preserved hearing (X 2 (1, N = 46) = 0.19, p = .67, V = 0.06). One year after surgery, 57% of patients had a decline in LFPTA >80 dB and were no longer considered candidates for EAS, with 34.7% still retaining low-frequency thresholds ≤80 dB. CNC word scores at 1 year were 69.9% and 61.4% among individuals with and without preserved low-frequency hearing respectively, measured in their CI ear alone, in their regular listening condition of EAS or electric only ( t (32) = 1.13, p = 0.27, d = 0.39, 95% CI = -6.51, 22.86). Device use time did not differ between groups. Among adults with preserved residual hearing at 1 year (n = 16), 44% used EAS, although there was no significant difference in performance between EAS users and nonusers with preserved hearing. Loss of residual hearing over time did not result in a decline in speech perception performance. CONCLUSION:The present study demonstrated favorable early rates of hearing preservation with a slim modiolar array. Performance was not significantly different in individuals with and without preserved low-frequency acoustic hearing, independent of EAS use. Compared with reports of short electrode use, the loss of residual hearing in patients implanted with this array did not impact speech perception performance.
PMID: 36534657
ISSN: 1538-4667
CID: 5462082

Prospective Assessment of Otologic Adverse Events due to Teprotumumab: Preliminary Results

Kay-Rivest, Emily; Belinsky, Irina; Kozlova, Anna; Byrd, Erin; McMenomey, Sean O; Jethanamest, Daniel
OBJECTIVE:To assess a series of patients receiving teprotumumab therapy and objectively quantify the rates of otologic adverse events. STUDY DESIGN:A prospective cohort study of adult patients receiving teprotumumab between May 2020 and January 2022. SETTING:Tertiary referral center. METHODS:Prior to treatment initiation, an ototoxicity-specific audiometric battery was completed, which included conventional audiometry (frequencies 250-8000 Hz), ultrahigh-frequency audiometry (9000-20,000 Hz), tympanometry, speech discrimination scores, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). Testing was then repeated after treatment completion. RESULTS:In total, 35 patients were recruited, with a median (range) age of 48.5 years (21-74), and 8 (22.8%) were male. The most common subjective symptom reported was a hearing decline (25.7%), followed by aural fullness (17.1%) and tinnitus (14.3%). Fourteen patients had both pre- and posttreatment audiometric data. Among them, 3 patients (21.4%) were found to have changes in standard frequency audiometry, and 10 (71.4%) had changes in high-frequency audiometry, with 2 patients having changes in both. Less than half (n = 5) of the 11 patients with changes in standard or high-frequency pure tone hearing noted subjective hearing decline. Changes in DPOAE were noted in 4 patients out of 13 (30.7%). Two patients discontinued treatment due to hearing decline. Finally, 3 patients (8.6%) were diagnosed with patulous eustachian tube (PET) by an otolaryngologist, and another 3 patients are suspected to have PET based on symptom description during ophthalmologic follow-up. CONCLUSION:In our cohort, a high incidence of otologic symptoms was found to be associated with teprotumumab usage. Subjective hearing decline, changes in ultrahigh-frequency hearing as well as eustachian tube dysfunction may be encountered and suggest the potential ototoxicity of teprotumumab.
PMID: 36939482
ISSN: 1097-6817
CID: 5462732

The Natural History of Primary Inner Ear Schwannomas: Outcomes of Long-Term Follow-Up

Khera, Zain; Kay-Rivest, Emily; Friedmann, David R; McMenomey, Sean O; Thomas Roland, J; Jethanamest, Daniel
OBJECTIVE:To describe the natural history of primary inner ear schwannomas over a long follow-up period. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective case series. SETTING/METHODS:Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS/METHODS:Patients with primary inner ear schwannomas with serial audiometric and radiologic follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Patterns of hearing loss, rate of hearing decline, presence of vestibular symptoms, and rate of tumor growth. RESULTS:A total of 12 patients with 13 tumors were identified. The mean duration of follow-up was 7 years. Forty-six percent of tumors were intracochlear, 15% were intravestibular, 23% were transmodiolar, and 15% were intravestibular-cochlear. Hearing loss was the most common presenting symptom, occurring in all patients. Among patients with serviceable hearing (AAO Class A or B) at the time of presentation, the average time to decline to a nonserviceable hearing level was 57.3 months (range, 21-117 mo). Hearing loss was sudden in 31% of patients, progressive in 61% and fluctuating in 8%. No patients had intractable vertigo; however, two required vestibular physiotherapy. On initial magnetic resonance imaging, the mean largest tumor dimension was 3.1 mm (standard deviation, 1.2 mm), and the mean largest dimension on most recent magnetic resonance imaging was 4.4 mm (standard deviation, 1.1 mm). Two tumors exhibited no growth over a follow-up of 11.3 and 2.8 years, respectively. Overall, the mean growth was 0.25 mm per year followed. Two patients underwent cochlear implantation with simultaneous tumor resection and had favorable outcomes. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Long-term follow-up suggests a conservative approach, with possible hearing rehabilitation at the time of deterioration, is a safe management strategy for primary inner ear schwannomas.
PMID: 36136609
ISSN: 1537-4505
CID: 5335592

The Frailty Phenotype in Older Adults Undergoing Cochlear Implantation

Kay-Rivest, Emily; Friedmann, David R; McMenomey, Sean O; Jethanamest, Daniel; Thomas Roland, J; Waltzman, Susan B
OBJECTIVE:To prospectively evaluate the frailty phenotype in a population of older adults and determine its association with 1) perioperative complications, 2) need for vestibular rehabilitation after surgery, and 3) early speech perception outcomes. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS/METHODS:Adults older than 65 years undergoing cochlear implantation. INTERVENTIONS/METHODS:The Fried Frailty Index was used to classify patients as frail, prefrail, or not frail based on five criteria: 1) gait speed, 2) grip strength, 3) unintentional weight loss, 4) weekly physical activity, and 5) self-reported exhaustion. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES/METHODS:Rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative falls, need for vestibular rehabilitation, and early speech perception outcomes. RESULTS:Forty-six patients were enrolled in this study. Five patients (10.8%) were categorized as frail and 10 (21.7%) as prefrail. The mean ages of frail, prefrail, and not frail patients were 80.9, 78.8, and 77.5, respectively. There were no intraoperative complications among all groups. Three patients required postoperative vestibular rehabilitation; all were not frail. One postoperative fall occurred in a nonfrail individual. Mean (standard deviation) device use times at 3 months in frail, prefrail, and not frail patients were 7.6 (3.5), 11.1 (3.6), and 11.6 (2.9) hours per day, respectively. Consonant-nucleus-consonant word scores 3 months after surgery in frail, prefrail, and not frail patients were 13% (12.2), 44% (19.7), and 51% (22.4), respectively. The median (range) number of missed follow-up visits (surgeon, audiologist, speech language pathologist combined) was 7 (1-10) in frail patients, compared with a median of 3 (0-4) and 2 (0-5) in prefrail and not frail patients. CONCLUSIONS:Frail patients did not have increased rates of surgical complications, need for vestibular rehabilitation, or postoperative falls. However, frail patients experienced challenges in accessing postoperative care, which may be addressed by using remote programming and rehabilitation.
PMID: 36190900
ISSN: 1537-4505
CID: 5361592

HiRes ultra series cochlear implant field recall: failure rates and early outcomes

Winchester, Arianna; Kay-Rivest, Emily; Friedmann, David R; McMenomey, Sean O; Shapiro, William H; Roland, J Thomas; Waltzman, Susan; Jethanamest, Daniel
OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Evaluate rates of Advanced Bionics Ultra 3D/Ultra cochlear implant failure in the setting of a worldwide device recall and report surgical and auditory outcomes after revision. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective chart review was performed for adult and pediatric patients implanted with at risk devices at our center from 2016 to 2020. Device failure rates, surgical, and auditory outcomes were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = 0.95). DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:Patients with device failure due to this field action performed well after revision implantation. Patients with bilateral at-risk devices but evidence of unilateral failure may elect to undergo simultaneous empiric revision of the contralateral device. Three patients who elected to change device manufacturers on revision have variable results that require further investigation. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Patients requiring revision for a device field action overall perform well. At-risk devices continue to require monitoring as a growing number are likely to fail over time.
PMID: 36411064
ISSN: 1754-7628
CID: 5384122

Modern Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Vestibular Schwannoma Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Berger, Assaf; Alzate, Juan Diego; Bernstein, Kenneth; Mullen, Reed; McMenomey, Sean; Jethanemest, Daniel; Friedmann, David R; Smouha, Eric; Sulman, Erik P; Silverman, Joshua S; Roland, J Thomas; Golfinos, John G; Kondziolka, Douglas
BACKGROUND:For patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has proven effective in controlling tumor growth while hearing preservation remains a key goal. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate hearing outcomes in the modern era of cochlear dose restriction. METHODS:During the years 2013 to 2018, 353 patients underwent Gamma knife surgery for VS at our institution. We followed 175 patients with pre-SRS serviceable hearing (Gardner-Robertson Score, GR 1 and 2). Volumetric and dosimetry data were collected, including biological effective dose, integral doses of total and intracanalicular tumor components, and hearing outcomes. RESULTS:The mean age was 56 years, 74 patients (42%) had a baseline GR of 2, and the mean cochlear dose was 3.5 Gy. The time to serviceable hearing loss (GR 3-4) was 38 months (95% CI 26-46), with 77% and 62% hearing preservation in the first and second years, respectively. Patients optimal for best hearing outcomes were younger than 58 years with a baseline GR of 1, free canal space ≥0.041 cc (diameter of 4.5 mm), and mean cochlear dose <3.1 Gy. For such patients, hearing preservation rates were 92% by 12 months and 81% by 2 years, staying stable for >5 years post-SRS, significantly higher than the rest of the population. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Hearing preservation after SRS for patients with VS with serviceable hearing is correlated to the specific baseline GR score (1 or 2), age, cochlear dose, and biological effective dose. Increased tumor-free canal space correlates with better outcomes. The most durable hearing preservation correlates with factors commonly associated with smaller tumors away from the cochlea.
PMID: 35973088
ISSN: 1524-4040
CID: 5299902

Matched Comparison of Hearing Outcomes in Patients With Vestibular Schwannoma Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery or Observation

Schnurman, Zane; Gurewitz, Jason; Smouha, Eric; McMenomey, Sean O; Roland, J Thomas; Golfinos, John G; Kondziolka, Douglas
BACKGROUND:Previous studies comparing hearing outcomes in patients managed with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and a watch-and-wait strategy were limited by small sample sizes that prevented controlling for potential confounders, including initial hearing status, tumor size, and age. OBJECTIVE:To compare hearing outcomes for patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) managed with observation and SRS while controlling for confounders with propensity score matching. METHODS:Propensity score matching was used to compare 198 patients with unilateral VS with initial serviceable hearing (99 treated with SRS and 99 managed with observation alone) and 116 with initial class A hearing (58 managed with SRS and 58 with observation), matched by initial hearing status, tumor volume, age, and sex. Kaplan-Meier survival methods were used to compare risk of losing class A and serviceable hearing. RESULTS:Between patients with VS managed with SRS or observation alone, there was no significant difference in loss of class A hearing (median time 27.2 months, 95% CI 16.8-43.4, and 29.2 months, 95% CI 20.4-62.5, P = .88) or serviceable hearing (median time 37.7 months, 95% CI 25.7-58.4, and 48.8 months, 95% CI 38.4-86.3, P = .18). For SRS patients, increasing mean cochlear dose was not related to loss of class A hearing (hazard ratio 1.3, P = .17) but was associated with increasing risk of serviceable hearing loss (hazard ratio of 1.5 per increase in Gy, P = .017). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:When controlling for potential confounders, there was no significant difference in loss of class A or serviceable hearing between patients managed with SRS or with observation alone.
PMID: 36001782
ISSN: 1524-4040
CID: 5334982