Faculty Bibliography

Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) methodologies and their application to medical imaging has led to an explosion of related research programs utilizing AI to produce state-of-the-art classification performance. Ideally, research culminates in dissemination of the findings in peer-reviewed journals. To date, acceptance or rejection criteria are often subjective; however, reproducible science requires reproducible review. The Machine Learning Education Sub-Committee of the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM) has identified a knowledge gap and need to establish guidelines for reviewing these studies. This present work, written from the machine learning practitioner standpoint, follows a similar approach to our previous paper related to segmentation. In this series, the committee will address best practices to follow in AI-based studies and present the required sections with examples and discussion of requirements to make the studies cohesive, reproducible, accurate, and self-contained. This entry in the series focuses on image classification. Elements like dataset curation, data pre-processing steps, reference standard identification, data partitioning, model architecture, and training are discussed. Sections are presented as in a typical manuscript. The content describes the information necessary to ensure the study is of sufficient quality for publication consideration and, compared with other checklists, provides a focused approach with application to image classification tasks. The goal of this series is to provide resources to not only help improve the review process for AI-based medical imaging papers, but to facilitate a standard for the information that should be presented within all components of the research study.

Despite growing awareness of problems with fairness in artificial intelligence (AI) models in radiology, evaluation of algorithmic biases, or AI biases, remains challenging due to various complexities. These include incomplete reporting of demographic information in medical imaging datasets, variability in definitions of demographic categories, and inconsistent statistical definitions of bias. To guide the appropriate evaluation of AI biases in radiology, this article summarizes the pitfalls in the evaluation and measurement of algorithmic biases. These pitfalls span the spectrum from the technical (eg, how different statistical definitions of bias impact conclusions about whether an AI model is biased) to those associated with social context (eg, how different conventions of race and ethnicity impact identification or masking of biases). Actionable best practices and future directions to avoid these pitfalls are summarized across three key areas: (a) medical imaging datasets, (b) demographic definitions, and (c) statistical evaluations of bias. Although AI bias in radiology has been broadly reviewed in the recent literature, this article focuses specifically on underrecognized potential pitfalls related to the three key areas. By providing awareness of these pitfalls along with actionable practices to avoid them, exciting AI technologies can be used in radiology for the good of all people.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To develop a deep learning-based method for robust and rapid estimation of the fatty acid composition (FAC) in mammary adipose tissue. METHODS:A physics-based unsupervised deep learning network for estimation of fatty acid composition-network (FAC-Net) is proposed to estimate the number of double bonds and number of methylene-interrupted double bonds from multi-echo bipolar gradient-echo data, which are subsequently converted to saturated, mono-unsaturated, and poly-unsaturated fatty acids. The loss function was based on a 10 fat peak signal model. The proposed network was tested with a phantom containing eight oils with different FAC and on post-menopausal women scanned using a whole-body 3T MRI system between February 2022 and January 2024. The post-menopausal women included a control group (n = 8) with average risk for breast cancer and a cancer group (n = 7) with biopsy-proven breast cancer. RESULTS: > 0.9 except chain length). The FAC values measured from scan and rescan data of the control group showed no significant difference between the two scans. The FAC measurements of the cancer group conducted before contrast and after contrast showed a significant difference in saturated fatty acid and mono-unsaturated fatty acid. The cancer group has higher saturated fatty acid than the control group, although not statistically significant. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The results in this study suggest that the proposed FAC-Net can be used to measure the FAC of mammary adipose tissue from gradient-echo MRI data of the breast.

Identifying systemic disease with medical imaging studies may improve population health outcomes. Although the pathogenesis of peripheral arterial calcification and coronary artery calcification differ, breast arterial calcification (BAC) on mammography is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD), a leading cause of death in women. While professional society guidelines on the reporting or management of BAC have not yet been established, and assessment and quantification methods are not yet standardized, the value of reporting BAC is being considered internationally as a possible indicator of subclinical CVD. Furthermore, artificial intelligence (AI) models are being developed to identify and quantify BAC on mammography, as well as to predict the risk of CVD. This review outlines studies evaluating the association of BAC and CVD, introduces the role of preventative cardiology in clinical management, discusses reasons to consider reporting BAC, acknowledges current knowledge gaps and barriers to assessing and reporting calcifications, and provides examples of how AI can be utilized to measure BAC and contribute to cardiovascular risk assessment. Ultimately, reporting BAC on mammography might facilitate earlier mitigation of cardiovascular risk factors in asymptomatic women.

The fastMRI breast dataset is the first large-scale dataset of radial k-space and Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine data for breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with case-level labels, and its public availability aims to advance fast and quantitative machine learning research.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:The intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) provides imaging biomarkers for breast tumor characterization. It has been extensively applied for both diagnostic and prognostic goals in breast cancer, with increasing evidence supporting its clinical relevance. However, variable performance exists in literature owing to the heterogeneity in datasets and quantification methods. METHODS/UNASSIGNED: RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:

Deep learning techniques hold immense promise for advancing medical image analysis, particularly in tasks like image segmentation, where precise annotation of regions or volumes of interest within medical images is crucial but manually laborious and prone to interobserver and intraobserver biases. As such, deep learning approaches could provide automated solutions for such applications. However, the potential of these techniques is often undermined by challenges in reproducibility and generalizability, which are key barriers to their clinical adoption. This paper introduces the RIDGE checklist, a comprehensive framework designed to assess the Reproducibility, Integrity, Dependability, Generalizability, and Efficiency of deep learning-based medical image segmentation models. The RIDGE checklist is not just a tool for evaluation but also a guideline for researchers striving to improve the quality and transparency of their work. By adhering to the principles outlined in the RIDGE checklist, researchers can ensure that their developed segmentation models are robust, scientifically valid, and applicable in a clinical setting.